Showing posts with label PageRank. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PageRank. Show all posts

Monday, 16 October 2017

SEO 2017: 8 Crucial Rules for dominating google’s search results.


In this article by R.L. Adams, a software engineer, serial entrepreneur and author of the popular blog called Wanderlustworker, he discusses the 8 crucial rules to make your posts and your content popular in search engines, specifically Google.  As we already know, there are tons of rules and recommendations of how to be popular or how to rank high in the Search engines but these insights come from a person that not only know the theory but also practice it, so this article must be valuable for people looking to apply them. What is also really important is not that you have the right tactics or rules but that these rules are recent and that you can still apply them as time goes by, this is why this 2017 guide for dominating Google’s search results may result pretty relevant nowadays.

Let’s start reminding you that Google’s algorithms offer the most relevant and most organic search results quickly and accurately. Google’s algorithms are constantly changing and updating, this is why it is really important for you to be prepared and keep track of all these changes so you can become a master in SEO. The author explains us how some people understood the power of ranking and the way this algorithm worked and started coming up with several ways to “fool” them “by building massive link farms and content farm, spinning low quality articles and auto generating links in an effort to outgun other listings and secure the top spots on Google” according to the author. Google has reacted by updating and launching new and enhanced algorithms such as Panda, Penguin and Hummingbird to booth weed out the spoofs and scammers, but also to improve semantic search, which now resulted in a pretty good tool for humans given that these algorithms practically mimic how humans would read content, and interpret the semantic of the texts for Google to give you quality and relevant content.

R.L. Adams throughout this entire article explains us that Search engines is a matter of getting the greatest initial return for a GREAT amount of effort, it is not an “easy peasy” job he says that it is a slow and painful process, this is why he shares these 8 rules with us.  In order to be ranked on the top, there’s basically one thing you must master at performing and this is to get Google’s trust in order to do that you must do as follows:

#1 Indexed Age: A completely new article in the web is going to be less trustworthy than one that has been there for more time. Age relies on when Google discovered the domain and not when it was created.

#2 Authority Profile: this means quality links coming from quality content across the web, reliable sources and sources that already have authority and also diversity, not all links coming from the same source.

#3 Underlying content: Make sure you double check that your article is well written, keyword centered and highly engaging otherwise it might be harmful.

But let’s get going to what really matters, the reason why we are all here for, which is the rules to dominate SEO:

Rule 1: Always work to gain Google’s trust. (Already discussed how)
Rule 2: Age always comes before beauty. Google looks for link consistency over time besides how good your site looks like. Age is measured by its content and the links that are pointing to it and it takes consistency into account, you can not work one month and then abandon your site two months.
Rule 3: Quality will trump quantity every single time. Focus on doing the right thing once rather than several times so Google’s algorithm can consider your content as quality.
Rule 4: Content will always be king. Great content is shared often, make sure that your content can deliver real value to the readers.
Rule 5: Regardless of what you have heard, size really does matter. It is more plausible that you deliver value if the article or the content is long enough so you can elaborate your ideas. A study showed that the articles that were on the top rankings were over 2,000 words but they are not superfluous, size matter but also quality.
Rule 6: Keywords, keywords, keywords but don’t over do it. Make sure you include in the content the keywords that you would like to relate your article to, but just don’t over do it. Google’s algorithms prevent to top rank spam pages. There’s good news about Google’s algorithms, it is that they can now identify semantics, so you don’t have to be repeating and repeating the same exact word.
Rule 7: Step up your mobile game: Today if you don’t make sure that your content can be seen through a mobile phone or your page takes too long to charge in mobile phones, your are dead.
Rule 8: Location, location, location (Of your link of course). In order for you to top rank  one of your main tasks is that you have to be linked from high quality, relevant site and not garbage.

These are the 8 rules that have given the author the opportunity to succeed in SEO with his blog. He ends his article preventing readers from thinking that this would be an easy job, it is going to be really difficult but whenever you seed limitless amounts of free organic traffic coming to your site, everything is worth it.

 Read full article on:


Monday, 31 October 2016

Will Google Win the Presidential Election?

Presently, we are but a few days before the US Presidential Election, a time when candidates Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton are pulling out final cards to win the White House. As the tensions have risen with the campaign, accusations have gotten progressively more absurd. Last September, Donald Trump made another dramatic statement against the Hillary Clinton campaign, this time accusing Google of deleting negative search results about Clinton. Trump said at a rally that "A new post-debate poll, the Google poll, has us leading Hillary Clinton by two points nationwide …. and that's despite the fact that Google search engine was suppressing the bad news about Hillary Clinton. How about that." He has also accused via Twitter that the tech companies - as Google - are trying to stifle the new revelations about the FBI investigation into the case of Clinton emails.
Similar claims have even been made by less politically affiliated sources, such as the popular video-news blog SourceFed, which stated in June that Google in particular has been “burying potential sources that could hurt Hillary in the Primary Elections by manipulating recommendations on their site”. Common negative search terms did not appear in the automatic fill-in bar as compared to other search engines. (For instance, “hillary clinton criminal” - while a more popular term did not appear in the automatic results, while the less popular “hillary clinton crime reform” did).



Considering the Threat

Rather serious accusations! If true, what are the consequences?  Internet users around the world rely on search engines as a fast means of being informed. There is a conception that the top results are most relevant and trustworthy and can be believed. This means that the first results and words seen by a viewer can have serious consequences on what they think about a subject. Robert Epstein, psychologist at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology, conducted a study regarding the “Search Engine Manipulation Effect”.  In a study in which subjects were shown search engine results of two candidates. The results greatly impacted the opinions due to the subjects making instantaneous judgements based on what they saw first. Regarding the US Election, Epstein ‘s study estimates that “based on win margins in national elections around the world that Google could determine the outcome of upwards of 25 percent of all national elections.”

Considering the Facts

So was Google really manipulating search results? And now to explain what really happens.
Both the Trump campaign and SourceFed have accused Google of human-made modifications. However, Google’s massive functions are carried out via automatic operations.  Trump’s statements about “suppressed bad news stories” are the result of PageRank, the link analysis algorithm which makes Google’s search engine so successful. PageRank’s automatic  operation is quite simple; the more an article is mentioned by hyperlinks, the higher it will likely be displayed in the top results of Google searches. This arguably makes the results even more relevant than competing search engines.  Google’s Privacy Policy  explains that this algorithm is based upon "the search frequency of a term by users in order to reflect the diversity of the information on the Web. This diversity, the proposed search terms can therefore sometimes seem strange or surprising”. 
Regarding the SourceFed accusations, Google released a statement saying that “autocomplete predictions are produced based on a number of factors including the popularity of search terms … Our systems are periodically updated to improve search, and our user’s search activity varies, so the terms that may appear in autocomplete may change overtime. Additionally, our systems filter a small set of offensive or inappropriate content from autocomplete predictions”. SourceFed’s accusations likely point to the results filtered due to the latter part of this statement. This  shows that many elements are considered in the search autocomplete bar and Google was not biased.
In short, there is no evidence that Google has human-caused manipulation of results. Both accusations have simply noticed the results of an automatic process.




Conclusions to be made for Digital Marketing

The concern and denial over this subject shows us that, political alliance aside, there are concepts here to be taken seriously, because potential “manipulation” of search results can lead to dramatic opinion change.  It is interesting to apply this to a Digital Marketing perspective since the US Presidential Election is effectively the Trump “Brand” and Hillary “Brand” fighting for “Positive Consumer Brand Equity” . This case shows us that accusing the Google of result manipulation is not accurate and that all non-paid results are subjected to the same algorithms. Therefore, understanding how the PageRank and AutoComplete can give us a practical lesson in SEO for firms which want to have a successful e-marketing strategy.  Marketing teams should be aware of the various factors that produce different autocomplete text and search engine results. There are differences depending on geographic-interests and the personal profiles Google has created for each account. Results of your product will appear is varying priority as a result - this should be considered when targeting specific markets. Potential “offensive” text content most also be considered, as this will lead to a filtering of this content from this results. Furthermore, the case reminds that viewers of online media pass instant judgement based on what they see first - this applies to not only search engine results, but social networks such as Facebook and Twitter. A single post can tarnish the brand image or cause lasting support in an instant.



Source: Donald Trump says Google proves he’s winning — and is trying to make sure he loses
By Nadiya Kutishcheva & StaĆ«l Anicet